There has been much hypothesis and talk concerning the future risk of fear monger assaults with weapons of mass pulverization against Israel, Western Europe, and the United States. On the off chance that psychological militant gatherings have weapons of mass demolition we should investigate all the potential focuses of chance for an assault and the accessibility of these weapons.
“Psychological militants have not just long recollections, they have boundless tolerance. They surely gain from their oversights.” – Edith E. Flynn, teacher of criminal equity at Northeastern University.The traditional news media and our political authority have been not exactly imminent on this issue, either to maintain a strategic distance from an open frenzy or at government bearing. By and by, this question still should be inquired.
The 9/11 fear monger assaults on Washington and New York was an operation that took years of arranging and was positively not a one-time strike on America. Despite the fact that Washington’s monstrous reaction in Afghanistan and Iraq, and in addition against psychological militant cells around the globe, appears to have found our foes napping, this relief won’t keep going forever. In the end they will respond with a gigantic counter assault intended for greatest open impact, U.S. embarrassment, and financial decimation.
To decide the objective, we should first investigate the plausible objectives of the counter Western players in this contention. While they can not plan to obliterate the United States as the world’s exclusive residual superpower, they are clearly keen on supplanting all the current “direct” Arab governments with fundamentalist, Islamic administrations.