On the off chance that Pakistan can so indecently disregard and decline to acknowledge the promotion of Kashmir with India. At that point India can likewise scrutinize the presence and formation of Pakistan in view of the condition of the Vienna Convention that a material rupture of an arrangement by one gathering qualifies the other party for end a settlement.
Pakistan has abused this provision since the start by not tolerating that part of the Mountbatten Plan in connection to the august states as it is clear from the instance of Kashmir. All things considered India has each privilege to scrutinize the presence of Pakistan the day India does this then the condition of Pakistan gets to be distinctly debated if the Pakistani rationale on Kashmir is connected on them by India.
Besides according to the Vienna Convention of the law of settlements of 1969 inconceivability of execution of an arrangement is additionally a legitimate ground for its end. Article 61 of the Vienna tradition says this. According to the difficulty execution test a settlement gets to be distinctly invalid in the event that one of the current party appears or is unequipped for actualizing the arrangement in functional conditions.
Pakistan by not actualizing or by abusing that condition of the Mountbatten Plan in connection to the august states by attempting to involve the condition of Jammu and Kashmir by compel and attaching a piece of its domain illicitly has exhibited to the world that was unequipped for executing the Mountbatten Plan in its letter and soul all things considered the difficulty of execution of a bargain would apply for this situation.