Foucault’s first work (Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason, 1961), guarantees Saeed’s numerous scholarly concerns. The topic of force – the science and the triangle of force, right and truth in the cutting edge time is, be that as it may, Foucault’s ancestry (Foucault, 1980: 139). He trusted that comprehension of family history of information without comprehension the relationship amongst learning and power is unrealistic.
Saeed has the view that the Europeans after the Enlightenment initially seized “East” on a “composed” way. He contends facilitate that all groups get their personalities through presentation alongside a “moment” – an outsider, a nonnative or a foe. This organized way to deal with the range of the world political and scholarly societies may affirm his attestation that the double way to deal with “us” and “them” or “I” and “you” are a vital part of any composed political framework.
In his view, this procurement will be conceivable through a talk of “differences” which is portrayed by the “East Studies”. Said tries to uncover an European venture, whereby Europe tries to characterize itself on a “dramatic stage whose gathering of people, director, and performers are for Europe” (Said, 2003: 71).
The West has seen the East as an “other” – a protest itself. In the Eighteenth Century with the appearance of the “Period of Rationalism” and a type of humanism in the Enlightenment the Islamic world was viewed as an image for all that, which Europe had passed, i.e.