Primanda, in his reaction to us, dismisses our elucidation and all through his article, he guaranteed that Sahelanthropus was more “primate like” than Australopithecus in each regard. He composed:
HY construct his announcements with respect to the suspicion that Sahelanthropus showed ‘more human-like traits’ than australopiths (Australopithecus, Paranthropus, Ardipithecus), yet living before them.
Nonetheless, Primanda disregards an essential truth. The individuals who made this remark on Sahelanthropus were the researchers who discovered this fossil and analyzed it, and these researchers are likewise advocates of developmental hypothesis. An article distributed in Nature magazine said:
What is wonderful about the chimp measured noggin TM 266-01-060-1 found by Brunet et al. is its mosaic nature. Put basically from the back it would appear that a chimpanzee, while from the front it could be mistaken for a 1.75-million-year-old progressed australopith.