The primate highlights include the structure of the face, and the little, apically worn, canine crowns. Other primate elements are found in the base of the head and in the different jaw part. On the off chance that we acknowledge these as adequate confirmation to arrange S.tchadensis as a primate at the base, or stem, of the current human clade, then it plays destruction with the clean model of human inceptions. Simply, a primate of this age ought to just barely be starting to hint at being a primate.
It surely ought not have the substance of a primate short of what 33% of its land age. Additionally on the off chance that it is acknowledged as a stem primate, under the clean model the standard of stinginess manages that all animals with more primitive appearances (and that is an extensive rundown) would, perforce, must be rejected from the family line of advanced humans.
Quickly, the fossil displays a photo that runs counter to the “transformative plan” which has been forced on the general public for over a century, since Darwin. This inconsistency is striking to the point that the Nature essayist looks at the disclosure of this fossil to the Burgess Shale fossils that show the Cambrian Explosion, which constitutes maybe the best-known paleontological proof against Darwin’s hypothesis:
The fauna of the Burgess Shale in Canada, which tests a confounding exhibit of ivertebrate gatherings nearly 500 million years back, is a popular case of assorted qualities at the base of a versatile radiation. Does S.tchadensis have a place with the African chimp likeness the Burgess Shale.