The hypothesis of development can’t clarify the Cambrian Explosion, the sudden appearance of more than 60 creature phyla on our planet. It additionally neglects to clarify the cause of mankind. The as of late found fossil makes this insufficiency much more self-evident. Primanda is against our noteworthy this reality, which is a trivial feedback.
Confronted with this reality, what Primanda needs to do is to demonstrate that Sahelanthropus’ moderately advanced attributes don’t really exist. He talks about two attributes, prognathism and foramen magnum position, however his examination is very shallow. His examination of prognathism is only superimposing the layouts of Sahelanthropus on some primate fossils, and he himself concedes that “this strategy for correlation might be imperfect” and that “the outcomes may not be of high esteem.”
His clarification of the foramen magnum is an avoid. This is likewise found in his outline in view of foramen magnum position; when contrasted with Australopithecus, Sahelanthropus is more cutting edge. What’s more, this affirms what we have been contending from the earliest starting point, that will be that Sahelanthropus, in spite of being more seasoned than Australopithecus, had more cutting edge highlights, and along these lines a developmental graph in view of these elements can’t be shaped.
Primanda made a show of reacting to this announcement in composing, “Sahelanthropus falls pleasantly in a transitional position, amongst chimp and human positions,” yet this overlooks the main issue totally. The fact of the matter is the examination amongst Sahelanthropus and Australopithecus.