The dissidents were peaceful in their activities and purpose. Any brutality was started by the supporters of the legislature, or the state security strengths, while amid the periods the dissenters turned to savagery it was unmistakably in self-preservation. When the savagery being utilized against them lessened they came back to their peaceful challenges.
Their tranquil challenge was ensured by Article 54 of the Egyptian constitution, while Article 57 plainly censured as unlawful the brutality the ace Mubarak goons were utilizing against them. Henceforth, to proclaim their development as ill-conceived would be troublesome from either an Islamic or a sacred premise.
This raises a related point. In that the dissidents were taking a stand in opposition to the overabundances of domineering, tyrant powers, they are taking part in the best Jihad. The Prophet, peace and favors upon him, said, “The best Jihad is a simply word notwithstanding a domineering ruler.
In light of this Hadith, what Islamic contention can legitimately be made to deny the general population their entitlement to stand in opposition to the oppression of their rulers?Others contend that these uprisings are sowing the seeds of unsteadiness in the locale.